<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2797923531103204252.post3672715729102055808..comments</id><updated>2009-11-18T18:14:55.469+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Comments on Majek's technical blog: Concurrent programming: It’s not about the languag...</title><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://popcnt.org/feeds/3672715729102055808/comments/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2797923531103204252/3672715729102055808/comments/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://popcnt.org/2008/05/concurrent-programming-its-not-about.html'/><author><name>majek</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>3</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2797923531103204252.post-7729101629385719770</id><published>2008-06-09T18:32:00.000+02:00</published><updated>2008-06-09T18:32:00.000+02:00</updated><title type='text'>I agree, I'd like to see concurrency primitives bu...</title><summary type='text'>I agree, I'd like to see concurrency primitives built into a lot of languages from here on out. spawn, receive, and ! should be in every language.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2797923531103204252/3672715729102055808/comments/default/7729101629385719770'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2797923531103204252/3672715729102055808/comments/default/7729101629385719770'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://popcnt.org/2008/05/concurrent-programming-its-not-about.html?showComment=1213029120000#c7729101629385719770' title=''/><author><name>Justin George</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00841137599327072247</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://popcnt.org/2008/05/concurrent-programming-its-not-about.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2797923531103204252.post-3672715729102055808' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2797923531103204252/posts/default/3672715729102055808' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2797923531103204252.post-906712129410733778</id><published>2008-06-03T01:22:00.000+02:00</published><updated>2008-06-03T01:22:00.000+02:00</updated><title type='text'>Thanks for the marketing.I doubt that any kind of ...</title><summary type='text'>Thanks for the marketing.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;I doubt that any kind of automatic and magic threading solutions are going to be adopted wider. Maybe I'm wrong, we'll see soon.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;I think that the problem is with the data. When the shared data is being big enough you run into known problems: blocking locks, synchronization issues, etc. But wait! Locks ought to be the solution for writing concurrent </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2797923531103204252/3672715729102055808/comments/default/906712129410733778'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2797923531103204252/3672715729102055808/comments/default/906712129410733778'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://popcnt.org/2008/05/concurrent-programming-its-not-about.html?showComment=1212448920000#c906712129410733778' title=''/><author><name>majek</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01251411797162710066</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='OpenSocialUserId' value='04522004647355336119'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://popcnt.org/2008/05/concurrent-programming-its-not-about.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2797923531103204252.post-3672715729102055808' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2797923531103204252/posts/default/3672715729102055808' type='text/html'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2797923531103204252.post-7502797940063441204</id><published>2008-06-03T00:18:00.000+02:00</published><updated>2008-06-03T00:18:00.000+02:00</updated><title type='text'>Majek,Pervasive Software, out of Austin, is taking...</title><summary type='text'>Majek,&lt;BR/&gt;Pervasive Software, out of Austin, is taking another approach and has created a Java framework called DataRush that developers can use to create highly parallel applications w/o any concurrent programming knowledge.  I think before skipping the “multiple processors” phase we should see how projects like the Intel App Dev. Toolkit that you mentioned and DataRush framework help us solve </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2797923531103204252/3672715729102055808/comments/default/7502797940063441204'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2797923531103204252/3672715729102055808/comments/default/7502797940063441204'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://popcnt.org/2008/05/concurrent-programming-its-not-about.html?showComment=1212445080000#c7502797940063441204' title=''/><author><name>Hunter</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/01885948785272811173</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://popcnt.org/2008/05/concurrent-programming-its-not-about.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2797923531103204252.post-3672715729102055808' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/2797923531103204252/posts/default/3672715729102055808' type='text/html'/></entry></feed>