tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2797923531103204252.post5959729556038103166..comments2008-08-04T13:13:35.676+02:00majekhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01251411797162710066noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2797923531103204252.post-38276154673925478742008-08-04T13:13:00.000+02:002008-08-04T13:13:00.000+02:002008-08-04T13:13:00.000+02:00

> Do you really want to give individual sites> the power to control the entire infrastructure> of how the internet is glued together?It's not about the infrastructure it's about the content. I don't want to give them the power. They already have it. Look at Facebook, Twitter, etc. They can remove any content they like.I feel that the www/http has major feature missing. It's "global"

majekhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01251411797162710066noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2797923531103204252.post-25978190908393956442008-07-30T23:21:00.000+02:002008-07-30T23:21:00.000+02:002008-07-30T23:21:00.000+02:00

That's all well and good if you have an internet whose infrastructure relies inherently on the existence of pre-defined social networking services. Do you really want to give individual sites the power to control the entire infrastructure of how the internet is glued together?The net is about random, decentralised and unmoderated publication. The only thing that everything on the net should be

tomalakhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07010495421893581198noreply@blogger.com